The head of Google’s Brain team is more worried about the lack of diversity in artificial intelligence than an AI apocalypse

As some would have it, robots are poised to take over the world in about 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

But one machine-learning expert — who is, after all, in a position to know — thinks that’s not the biggest issue facing artificial intelligence. In fact, it’s not an issue at all.

“I am personally not worried about an AI apocalypse, as I consider that a completely made-up fear,” Jeff Dean, a senior fellow at Google, wrote during a Reddit AMA on Aug. 11. “I am concerned about the lack of diversity in the AI research community and in computer science more generally.” (Emphasis his.)

Ding, ding, ding. The issue that the tech industry is trying to maneuver their way around, for better or worse, is the same issue that can stunt the progress of “humanistic thinking” in the development of artificial intelligence, according to Dean.

For the optimists in the audience, Google Brain wants to improve lives, Dean wrote. And how can you improve lives without people with diverse perspectives and backgrounds helping to build and develop the technology you hope will impact positive change? (Answer: You can’t.)

“One of the things I really like about our Brain Residency program is that the residents bring a wide range of backgrounds, areas of expertise (e.g. we have physicists, mathematicians, biologists, neuroscientists, electrical engineers, as well as computer scientists), and other kinds of diversity to our research efforts,” Dean wrote.

“In my experience, whenever you bring people together with different kinds of expertise, different perspectives, etc., you end up achieving things that none of you could do individually, because no one person has the entire skills and perspective necessary.”

For more Software Development and Website Development, Contact +91-9568180808 or Spokes Technologies

Microsoft’s Golden Key leak illustrates why governments should stop asking for backdoors

Security researchers MY123 and Slipstream revealed this week that Microsoft accidentally leaked security keys that allow Windows-based computers, phones and tablets to be unlocked and loaded with other operating systems, as well as malicious software like rootkits.

While the company has attempted to patch Windows to fix this, the researchers believe that it’d be impossible for Microsoft to render the leaked keys useless.

It isn’t clear just how much of a security risk this poses for users: It appears that one would need to physically access the target device to use the key and install other software on it.

However, it shows exactly why governments and law enforcement agencies should stop asking tech companies to build backdoors into their products and software, in the hopes that they’ll be able to listen in on communications and catch criminals in the act.

When you create a backdoor, you have to lock it somehow. In Microsoft’s case the company did so to allow for easier debugging. But now that the key is publicly available, it can easily be misused by anyone who can get their hands on it.

It’s a danger that governments don’t seem to understand. Remember the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone that the FBI wanted to unlock, and how it tried to get Apple to create a backdoored version of iOS to assist with that case? What if that version was somehow leaked publicly and became available to anyone who wanted to hack iOS devices in their possession?

It’s not just the US: The UK is inching closer to passing a law that would require service providers to unlock encrypted customer data and correspondence at the government’s request – and never admit to doing so.

Microsoft’s bungle is an example of how things could go south when creating backdoors. One can only hope that the debacle will help convince politicians and law enforcement officials to stop asking for ways to endanger citizens’ security and privacy.

Contact Spokes Technologies for website development, software development and professional training cum placements.